Technology Integration Assessment for Lutheran Schools
| Knowledge Domain | 1Developing | 2Emerging | 3Proficient | 4Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology Knowledge (TK) Understanding digital tools and capabilities |
Basic operation only
• Uses technology with frequent help • Limited to one or two familiar tools • Struggles with technical problems Ex: Can open apps but needs help with basic functions
|
Competent use of familiar tools
• Comfortable with routine technology tasks • Uses several tools independently • Seeks help for complex functions Ex: Proficient with Google Workspace, learning new apps
|
Adapts technology to lesson needs
• Selects appropriate tools for specific purposes • Troubleshoots common problems • Explores new features and applications Ex: Chooses between video, interactive tools based on learning goals
|
Innovative, seamless integration
• Masters multiple technology platforms • Customizes tools for unique needs • Mentors others in technology use Ex: Creates custom digital learning environments
|
| Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) Understanding teaching methods and learning |
Teacher-centered instruction
• Primarily lecture-based delivery • Limited student interaction • One-size-fits-all approach Ex: Teacher talks, students listen and take notes
|
Some student engagement strategies
• Includes basic interactive elements • Uses questioning techniques • Attempts differentiation occasionally Ex: Mix of lecture with some group work or discussions
|
Variety of research-based methods
• Balances teacher and student-centered approaches • Uses multiple engagement strategies • Adapts methods to student needs Ex: Project-based learning with scaffolded support
|
Differentiated, student-centered approaches
• Seamlessly adapts to diverse learning needs • Facilitates rather than directs learning • Creates authentic learning experiences Ex: Choice-based learning with personalized pathways
|
| Content Knowledge (CK) Deep understanding of subject matter |
Surface-level content coverage
• Covers topics at basic level • Limited connections between concepts • Relies heavily on textbook Ex: Reviews chapter content without deeper analysis
|
Adequate content understanding
• Demonstrates solid grasp of material • Makes some connections between topics • Addresses student misconceptions Ex: Explains concepts clearly with relevant examples
|
Deep content connections
• Shows relationships across topics • Connects to real-world applications • Anticipates and addresses misconceptions Ex: Links historical events to current issues and faith principles
|
Expert-level content integration
• Demonstrates mastery across disciplines • Creates innovative content connections • Inspires deeper student inquiry Ex: Weaves together multiple subject areas seamlessly
|
| TPACK Integration How well T, P, and C work together |
Technology added without clear purpose
• Technology feels forced or disconnected • Does not enhance learning goals • Creates more problems than solutions Ex: Using tablets just to use tablets
|
Technology supports some learning goals
• Clear purpose for technology use • Enhances traditional methods • Students see the connection Ex: Digital worksheets that add interactivity
|
Technology enhances content and pedagogy
• Technology transforms learning experience • Enables new ways of understanding content • Supports diverse learning styles Ex: VR field trips that bring history to life
|
Seamless integration serving all goals
• Technology is invisible yet powerful • Creates impossible-without-tech learning • Students become creators, not just consumers Ex: Global collaboration projects with authentic audiences
|
| Lutheran Education Integration Faith and mission alignment |
No clear connection to mission
• Technology use conflicts with values • Isolates students from community • No consideration of faith integration Ex: Technology creates barriers to relationship-building
|
Basic mission alignment
• Technology doesn't conflict with values • Some attention to appropriate use • Occasional faith connections Ex: Uses technology respectfully but few explicit faith ties
|
Intentional faith integration
• Technology supports spiritual formation • Builds Christian community • Models faithful stewardship Ex: Online collaboration builds community while studying creation
|
Transformational Christian formation
• Technology enables authentic faith exploration • Students grow in discipleship through learning • Prepares faithful leaders and servants Ex: Students create digital stories of God's work in their lives
|
For Classroom Observation: Focus on one domain at a time during visits. Look for evidence rather than perfection.
For Teacher Development: Use as a coaching tool to identify growth areas and celebrate strengths.
For Self-Assessment: Teachers can reflect on their own practice and set goals.
Beginning to explore integration; needs significant support
Shows understanding; inconsistent implementation
Consistent, purposeful integration that enhances learning
Innovative, transformational use that others can learn from
Ready to use this rubric?